Isn’t it scary how the pieces of the
jigsaw that make us who we are cannot be predicted?
It can’t be done.
Random instances lodge in us like
splinters when we’re young and no-one can foresee which of the thousands of
interactions, sights and sounds that comprise a child’s daily life will
resonate and which will pass by barely noticed.
The thing is, as adults,
we don’t know which words spoken thoughtlessly in anger or, indeed, which moments
of high praise will be the ones that shape a child forever.
That's scary.
Let’s consider Rolf Harris for a
moment...OK that’s long enough…there are those who have dismissed his acts as
trivial and, yes, some people would have shrugged off such unwanted attention
and never given it another thought but, for others, his actions seriously
impacted on their attitudes to men, relationships, sex. However, he should have known the damage he might have been doing and kept his hands to himself. Quite rightly, then, we
have laws protecting us all against any kind of abuse of the body.
So to The Bunker Diary and the idea that words can be harmful. Its
content, allegedly (I haven’t read it yet,) makes The Hunger Games and
Divergent look as benign as Winnie-the-Pooh. It has, therefore, fuelled a
debate about whether YA books should be included under the umbrella of
children’s fiction. I don’t want to express an opinion about this (unusual, I
know) instead I want draw attention to the fact that we seem to be edging dangerously
close to the idea of certificating books.
“NO!” I cry in anguish.
And I repeat, “NO!”
Please let there remain one
bastion of freedom in our already overly-proscribed lives.
There is no doubt that books can
be enormously powerful. Reading Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar and D H Lawrence’s poem Tortoise Shout in the 6th form had profound influences
on my virginal and confused sexuality: The majority of that same class probably
don’t remember anything about either text. Likewise, James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man* (apart
from causing severe psychological damage to innocent 17 and 18 year-olds by
boring them senseless for weeks on end) left me with a deeply embedded unease
about hell. I don’t believe in hell in any rational way but…what if…
There is no reasoned argument that
can unpick the impact of Joyce’s words. They have become an entrenched part of
my being. Although I was Christened C of E and am agnostic, I carry Catholic
guilt by proxy. Who knew an A level set text could have such power?
So…
“NO!” I cry again, this time in
frustration.
Because if those writers hadn’t
shaped me, others would have (and did in very positive ways.)
Yes, words and moving pictures can and do harm us, but, unlike physical harm, we can make choices about what children in our care can cope with watching or reading. We cannot protect children from all the bad
things in the world, no matter how much we may want to, no matter how hard we
try. Scraped knees and banged heads, scary villains and bad dreams, they are all
part of growing up. A child who never falls over, never has a nightmare, is only
exposed to happy stories, will still have their share of dark jigsaw pieces cut
by a harsh word, a small injustice, the loss of something cherished or Disney's Snow White. Ultimately,
we cannot shape our children’s jigsaw pieces but we can take responsibility for
the way we behave and the things that we say. (See Part 2)
* I have a German copy if anyone wants to borrow it. My fellow students gave it to me on my 18th birthday as we happened to be in Germany at the time. Bless them!! Grrrr!
Great piece jane. X So true.
ReplyDeleteThank you :-)
ReplyDelete